傲慢与偏见英文鉴赏
~~~~《傲慢与偏见》英文读后感
MISS AUSTEN never attempts to describe a scene or a class of society with which she was not herself thoroughly acquainted. The conversations of ladies with ladies, or of ladies and gentlemen together, are given, but no instance occurs of a scene in which men only are present. The uniform quality of her work is one most remarkable point to be observed in it. Let a volume be opened at any place: there is the same good English, the same refined style, the same simplicity and truth. There is never any deviation into the unnatural or exaggerated; and how worthy of all love and respect is the finely disciplined genius which rejects the forcible but transient modes of stimulating interest which can so easily be employed when desired, and which knows how to trust to the never-failing principles of human nature! This very trust has sometimes been made an objection to Miss Austen, and she has been accused of writing dull stories about ordinary people. But her supposed ordinary people are really not such very ordinary people. Let anyone who is inclined to criticise on this score endeavor to construct one character from among the ordinary people of his own acquaintance that shall be capable of interesting any reader for ten minutes. It will then be found how great has been the discrimination of Miss Austen in the selection of her characters, and how skillful is her treatment in the management of them. It is true that the events are for the most part those of daily life, and the feelings are those connected with the usual joys and griefs of familiar existence; but these are the very events and feelings upon which the happiness or misery of most of us depends; and the field which embraces them, to the exclusion of the wonderful, the sentimental, and the historical, is surely large enough, as it certainly admits of the most profitable cultivation. In the end, too, the novel of daily real life is that of which we are least apt to weary: a round of fancy balls would tire the most vigorous admirers of variety in costume, and the return to plain clothes would be hailed with greater delight than their occasional relinquishment ever gives. Miss Austen’s personages are always in plain clothes, but no two suits are alike: all are worn with their appropriate differen AS we should expect from such a life, Jane Austen’s view of the world is genial, kindly, and, we repeat, free from anything like cynicism. It is that of a clear-sighted and somewhat satirical onlooker, loving what deserves love, and amusing herself with the foibles, the self-deceptions, the affectations of humanity. Refined almost to fastidiousness, she is hard upon vulgarity; not, however, on good-natured vulgarity, such as that of Mrs. Jennings in “Sense and Sensibility,“ but on vulgarity like that of Miss Steele, in the same novel, combined at once with effrontery and with meanness of soul
Pride and Prejudice is a chefdoeuvre. But my first impression of this story was from screen.
It’s long long ago, maybe before I can read english books. I don’t remember which movie edition I had seen. But I was impressed by the music, the scenery and the costume. I was very favor of a section of music in its balls. It’s pretty brisk, liked a wonderful song of a bird. Regarding to the characters, I liked Elizabeth, the heroine,though I didn’t think she’s beautiful. But she’s smart. However, I didn’t pay much attention to the plot. I thought it’s so long that it made me impatient and bored. By now, I haven’t read the whole story in English or its Chinese version, either. I owe it to my prejudice.
In fact, I didn’t understand the story at that time. I didn’t know why it called Pride and Prejudice. Of course someone was pride, but I didn’t find where’ s the prejudice. I thought it’s normal, the way people treated each other in that. I considered prejudice would be very disgusting. But to the movie everthing was OK in my minds, except its length. Now, I think I have understood more about it. I’m a prejudiced person so I can’t find where’s wrong. I merely like to do the things I like. Everytime I meet somebody or something,my thinking about he or it all depends on my foregone experience and my mood of the time. I like it so just like it, if not so just not. I’m a person thinking by heart not by brain. What is worse, I actually didn’t think it’s wrong. I thought everyone is all like that.Everyone has his special way to cognize the world. So it’s individuality, not prejudice. But I think something is wrong. Though everyone can judge in the way he likes, he can’t ignore other ones. You can like what you like and hate what you hate, but you should be objective when you meet external world. I think it means that you should consider things roundly, not just partial. Individuality is different from prejudice. What is it? I need to think more.
傲慢与偏见
（1）~~~~《傲慢与偏见》英文读后感
MISS AUSTEN never attempts to describe a scene or a class of society with which she was not herself thoroughly acquainted. The conversations of ladies with ladies, or of ladies and gentlemen together, are given, but no instance occurs of a scene in which men only are present. The uniform quality of her work is one most remarkable point to be observed in it. Let a volume be opened at any place: there is the same good English, the same refined style, the same simplicity and truth. There is never any deviation into the unnatural or exaggerated; and how worthy of all love and respect is the finely disciplined genius which rejects the forcible but transient modes of stimulating interest which can so easily be employed when desired, and which knows how to trust to the never-failing principles of human nature! This very trust has sometimes been made an objection to Miss Austen, and she has been accused of writing dull stories about ordinary people. But her supposed ordinary people are really not such very ordinary people. Let anyone who is inclined to criticise on this score endeavor to construct one character from among the ordinary people of his own acquaintance that shall be capable of interesting any reader for ten minutes. It will then be found how great has been the discrimination of Miss Austen in the selection of her characters, and how skillful is her treatment in the management of them. It is true that the events are for the most part those of daily life, and the feelings are those connected with the usual joys and griefs of familiar existence; but these are the very events and feelings upon which the happiness or misery of most of us depends; and the field which embraces them, to the exclusion of the wonderful, the sentimental, and the historical, is surely large enough, as it certainly admits of the most profitable cultivation. In the end, too, the novel of daily real life is that of which we are least apt to weary: a round of fancy balls would tire the most vigorous admirers of variety in costume, and the return to plain clothes would be hailed with greater delight than their occasional relinquishment ever gives. Miss Austen’s personages are always in plain clothes, but no two suits are alike: all are worn with their appropriate differen AS we should expect from such a life, Jane Austen’s view of the world is genial, kindly, and, we repeat, free from anything like cynicism. It is that of a clear-sighted and somewhat satirical onlooker, loving what deserves love, and amusing herself with the foibles, the self-deceptions, the affectations of humanity. Refined almost to fastidiousness, she is hard upon vulgarity; not, however, on good-natured vulgarity, such as that of Mrs. Jennings in “Sense and Sensibility,“ but on vulgarity like that of Miss Steele, in the same novel, combined at once with effrontery and with meanness of soul
Pride and Prejudice is a chefdoeuvre. But my first impression of this story was from screen.
It’s long long ago, maybe before I can read english books. I don’t remember which movie edition I had seen. But I was impressed by the music, the scenery and the costume. I was very favor of a section of music in its balls. It’s pretty brisk, liked a wonderful song of a bird. Regarding to the characters, I liked Elizabeth, the heroine,though I didn’t think she’s beautiful. But she’s smart. However, I didn’t pay much attention to the plot. I thought it’s so long that it made me impatient and bored. By now, I haven’t read the whole story in English or its Chinese version, either. I owe it to my prejudice.
In fact, I didn’t understand the story at that time. I didn’t know why it called Pride and Prejudice. Of course someone was pride, but I didn’t find where’ s the prejudice. I thought it’s normal, the way people treated each other in that. I considered prejudice would be very disgusting. But to the movie everthing was OK in my minds, except its length. Now, I think I have understood more about it. I’m a prejudiced person so I can’t find where’s wrong. I merely like to do the things I like. Everytime I meet somebody or something,my thinking about he or it all depends on my foregone experience and my mood of the time. I like it so just like it, if not so just not. I’m a person thinking by heart not by brain. What is worse, I actually didn’t think it’s wrong. I thought everyone is all like that.Everyone has his special way to cognize the world. So it’s individuality, not prejudice. But I think something is wrong. Though everyone can judge in the way he likes, he can’t ignore other ones. You can like what you like and hate what you hate, but you should be objective when you meet external world. I think it means that you should consider things roundly, not just partial. Individuality is different from prejudice. What is it? I need to think more.
（2）《傲慢与偏见》：
In fact, this book has been in contact with the first, but then the story of a very complex patient did not read a few chapters there will be no interest, has been set aside until today to pick up again. But when they look at the beginning of chapters still feel very boring, it understood only in here for the scene after the ambush pen. Blink of an eye, more than three chapter is over, and people’s character is also very clear that it was a portrait of the author. This book seems to be only two kinds of people: the wise and foolish, there is no absolute good or bad, except perhaps Wickham liar. He used his clever flattery, as well as the ability to pay a “pleasing“ the instrument, fascinated Elizabeth, kept for their own grievances washing, Darcy slander. He’s funny, so full of flaws, and Elizabeth Congmingguoren are able to mesh with Bin Miss rebuttal, and Lady Catherine contradict, but still led by the nose by Wickham. To be honest, I do not think he cheated Elizabeth is a “fool.“ Always first, Mr. arrogant, disrespectful way well into Elizabeth’s mind, but also on how good opinion of him? The comments of other people, how can easily turn a deaf ear? Have a prejudice against Darcy is normal. I am talking about other people is a natural means of Xiangmaotangtang the Wickham. There is no denying that Wickham with a long handsome face, is also installed on the surface very “gentleman.“ Although “The human cannot the facial expression “, “know the human to know the surface not to be intimate“ Even I can say that living in the twenty-first century, so as to the identity of the spectator to see the story, Wickham still have a good opinion, how can we complain Elizabeth This is a life of the times in the last girl?
The book is closed, taste carefully about it, just found the whole novel, was attractive because it is completely relaxed style of humor. Elizabeth laughed at the irony is that those self-gentleman, the aristocratic lady stood thoroughly exposed. The father of Elizabeth Bennet, even ridiculed by his wife and daughter for the family to be happy, fortunate Kenya? Unfortunately, Kenya?
《热爱生命》：
The famous novel “love life“ was a sensation in Europe and America, and has been praised Lenin. Works to show the nature of the strong, brave and adventurous spirit of romance, “To Live“ strong will to attract me deeply, is excited about reading. This novel, by Jack London with great artistic strength to calm a soul-stirring account of the life and death struggle of the story, showing how to love life to help overcome the death of a person; Despite the Cross, the sick, exhausted, still in In the struggle to keep up with bare hands in the back of a uniform E Lang, and the world of ice and snow through the wilderness struggling to come to the beach, was finally rescued by a whaler.
The tragic story, vividly demonstrates the great human and strong. Full display of the depths of human nature Moments, and vivid descriptions of a life’s tenacity and strong, struck up a tenacious hymn to life, the spirits can be described as awesome.
Life itself contains enormous potential energy. Sometimes life is very fragile moment, it may come to naught; life, but sometimes unusual strong, so strong was amazing. This allows you to power in the face no matter what, even if you swallow is the wild, wild animals, or hunger, disease, and will support you bravely overcome it. And behind the scenes support life, the energy is no doubt that conviction. As long as the hearts of survival is also the belief that they do not easily give up their lives, and then the embarrassing situation of Juechufengsheng also. On the other hand, love life, it is necessary to have faith, be pursued. When people have no faith, not the pursuit of life will become a full body, and what has been a dead? ! .
In real life, it was untimely for the lament, a dream life, some people really do not intend to complain alive, but some people say life is painful and boring; not so in the belief that the instigation of life, what we see is too many The life of emptiness and boredom, too much of the game of life, decadence and depressed too much, as well as bored to death ... .... The other day to see a report that China’s current annual suicide cases in the most rural areas, and the pesticide is the culprit; It also reflects the number from the side of China’s rural population is currently the overall quality of the city relative to be further enhanced. Encounter live or work in some of the difficulties small and not try to overcome resolved, but “anger“, the bigger things, the event will be much Xunsimihuo. This novel of the same character to overcome obstacles, compared to the courage to survive difficult it is different. May be a lot of you have seen the show or people with Games for the Disabled, which the Warriors Shencanzhijian are difficult to overcome various difficulties and even torture, made even healthy people find it hard to complete the task. They are the love of life, difficulties with the courage to fight against a model.
Jack London’s “love life“ has given us a profound lesson: In order to achieve a life goal, it is necessary to life with all difficulties and obstacles on the road to do the life-and-death struggle, and daring to win. In the face of life and work of the difficulties and even life-threatening, we can not sit still; resistance only, Apart from the victory because we have no choice! This novel’s main character in the face of many difficulties and obstacles, want to give up life and death choice is no longer easy, but he did not die willingly, he chose to fight. As a result, life must be pursued, it is necessary to live a very dynamic game, career achievements, we must learn to live in strong and learn to fight, so that we can live up to the life of the great trust in order to be worthy of life itself.
, Is in the nature of the small, too small all over the floor as the grassland. But the tiny “person“ because of the tenacity of life and conviction walked from time immemorial, has created a colorful civilization and wealth.
Let us never embrace of the great, tenacious of life; let Evergreen Tree of Life!
英文诗歌
’ This the last rose of summer这是夏日最后的玫瑰
Left blooming alone;独自绽放着；
All her lovely companions所有昔日动人的同伴
Are faded and gone;都已凋落残逝；
No flower of her kindred,身旁没有同类的花朵，
No rose-bud is nigh,没有半个玫瑰苞，
to reflect back her blushes,映衬她的红润，
Or give sigh for sigh.分担她的忧愁。
I’ll not leave thee, thou lone one!我不会离开弧零零的你！
To pine on the stem;让你单独地憔悴；
Since the lovely are sleeping,既然美丽的同伴都已入眠，
Go, sleep thou with them.去吧！你也和她们一起躺着。
thus kindly I scatter为此，我好心在散放
Thy leaves o’er the bed你的丽叶在花床上
Where thy mates of the garden那儿，也是你花园的同伴
Lie scentless and dead.无声无息躺着的地方。
Soon may I follow,不久我也可能追随我朋友而去，
When friendships decay,当友谊渐逝，
And from Love’s shining circle像从灿烂之爱情圈中
The gems drop away.掉落的宝石。
When true hearts lie withered,当忠诚的友人远去，
And fond ones are flown,所爱的人飞走，
O! who would inhabit啊！谁还愿留在
This bleak world alone?这荒冷的世上独自凄凉？
-relinquishment
